Comp 550

Course Website

Terms & Concepts

• CL - computational linguistics
• NLP - natural language processing
• NLU - natural language understanding
• NLG - natural language generation
• Semantics, pragmatics, discourse, syntax, phonology, phonetics, morphology
• Morpheme - inflection, derivation; free, bound (prefixes, suffixes, infixes, circumfixes)
• Language - isolating, synthetic
• Lemmatization
• Lexicon
• Morphotactics
• FSA - finite state automata - Q Σ q₀ σ F
• Porter stemmer
• Morphological parsing - surface (foxes), intermediate (fox^s#), underlying (fox +N +Pl)
• FST - finite state transducer - FSA with output symbols (Δ)
• Word - tokens, types
• Term frequency - TF(w, S)
• Relative frequency - RF(w, S)
• Corpus
• Zipf’s Law, Zipf-Mandelbrow Law
• Long tail
• N-grams - unigram, bigram, trigram
• k-fold cross validation
• Entropy - H(p)
• Cross entropy - H(p, q)
  • Estimation
• Perplexity - Perplexity(p, q)
• MLE - maximum likelihood estimation
• Good-turing smoothing
• Naïve Bayes
• Supervised, semi-supervised, unsupervised learning
  • Clustering, grammar induction, word relatedness
• POS - part of speech
• Classification, regression
• N-grams, bag of words
• Naïve Bayes
• POS, modals, auxiliary verbs, conjunctions, particles
• Open classes, neologisms, content words
• Closed classes, function words
• Forward algorithm, backward algorithm, forward & backward, viterbi algorithm
• Random restarts, biased initialization
• Chunking (shallow parsing), named-entity recognition
• IOB tagging
• Generative, discriminative
• LC-CRF - Linear-chain conditional random fields
• Constituency
• FSA vs CFG
• CYK
• PCFG
• Constituent parsing, dependency parsing
• Hearst
• Hypernymy, hyponymy
• Synonymy, antonymy
• Polysemy
• Homonymy, homophone, homograph
• Metonymy, synecdoche
• Holonymy, meronymy
• WordNet, synset
• Lesk, Yarowsky, bootstrapping
• PMI - pointwise mutation information
• SVD - singular value decomposition
• Word embeddings
• Co-compositionality
• Domain of discourse, variables, predicates, functions, logical connectives, quantifiers
• FOL - first order logic
• Lambda calculus, beta reduction, type-raising
• Neo-davidsonian event semantics
• Russell’s definite descriptions
• Cooper storage, store
• Discourse markers
• Referent, referring expression
• Anaphora, antecedents, cataphora, zero anaphora, bridging reference
• Pleonastic pronouns, clefting
• Hobb

Lecture 1 - 2018/09/04

Lecture 2 - 2018/09/06

• Morpheme - subpart of a word that cannot be broken down any further
  • Free morphemes can occur on their own
  • Bound morphemes must occur with other morphemes as parts of words
    • Prefix (before), suffix (after), infix (between), circumfix (around)
• Inflectional morphology - expresses grammatical function required by language
• Derivational morphology - derives a new word, possibly of a different part of speech
• Isolating languages - low morpheme-to-word ratio
• Synthetic languages - high morpheme-to-word ratio
• Computation Tasks
  • Morphological recognition - is this a well formed word?
  • Stemming - cut affixes off to find the stem
  • Morphological analysis
    • Lemmatization - remove inflectional morphology & recover lemma
    • Full morphological analysis - recover full structure
• FSA - finite state automata

Lecture 3 - 2018/09/11

• Word - smallest unit that can appear in isolation
• Convenient assumption is that words are delimited by spaces
• Word frequency
  • Term frequency: TF(w, S) = #w in corpus S
    • eg TF(cat, the cat sat on the mat) = 1
  • Relative frequency: RF(w, S) = TF(w, S) / |S|
    • eg RF(cat, the cat sat on the mat) = ⅙
• Corpus - collection of text; used for text to count
• Zipf’s Law: f ∝ 1/r
  • Frequency of word type is inversely proportional to rank of word type (by frequency)
• Zipf-Mandelbrow Law - better fit
  • f = P/(r + ρ)^B or log f = log P - B log(r + ρ)

Lecture 4 - 2018/09/13

• Entropy - minimum number of bits needed to communicate some message if we know what probability distribution the message is drawn from
• Cross entropy is for when we don’t know the distribution
  • H(p, q) = -Σ^k_{i = 1} p_ilog₂q_i
  • Estimate: H(p, q) = -(1/N) log₂ q(w₁…w_N)
  • Perplexity(p, q) = 2^{H(p, q)}
  • Eg: [A B C B B], M: P(A) = 0.3, P(B) = 0.4, P(C) = 0.3
    • q = 0.3 * 0.4</sup>3</sup> * 0.3
    • Perp(M) = 2^{-&frac15;log₂q}
• Overfitting - model that is tailored to the training data, making it a poor representation of new data
• OOV - out of vocabulary
• Explicitly modelling OOV items
  • Assign vocabulary items less frequent than some frequency threshold <UNK>
  • Treat <UNK> as some vocabulary word
  • Use <UNK> for unseen words during testing
• Smoothing - shift probability mass to cases that we haven’t seen before/are unsure about on unseen data
• Good-turing smoothing
  • N = Σ_if_i x i
  • c* = (c + 1)f_c+1/f_c
  • P(w_c) = c*/N
  • P(UNK) = f₁/N
  • Problem with high c as f_c+1 is often 0. Solution is to estimate log f_c^LR = a log c + b (LR → linear relationship)

Lecture 5 - 2018/09/18

• Supervised learning - model has access to some input data and corresponding output data (eg a label)
• Unsupervised learning - model has only input data
• Clustering - finding hidden structure in data without labels
• Learning - creating good characterization of data
• Semi-supervised learning - outputs for some inputs but not all
• Grey Area
  • Specific rules
    • eg anything ending in -ed is a verb
    • Variously called semi-supervised, distantly supervised, minimally supervised, or unsupervised
  • Give seed set
    • eg learning sentiment lexicon; gives positive seeds (good, awesome, great) and negative seeds (bad, awful, dreadful)
• Regression - y is a continuous outcome
• Classification - y is a discrete outcome
• Linear Regression
• N-grams
  • Aka bag-of-words
  • Versions
    • Presence of absence of an N-gram (1 or 0)
    • Count of N-gram
    • Proportion of total document
    • Scaled versions of counts
• POS tags
  • Crudely captures syntactic patterns
  • Needs preprocessing
• Naïve Bayes
  • P(y|x) = P(y)∏_iP(x_i|y)/P(x)

Lecture 6 - 2018/09/20

• Part of speech
  • Identifies some grammatical properties of words
  • Includes
    • Model & auxiliary words - Did the chicken cross the road?
    • Conjunctions - and, but
    • Particles - look up, turn down
• Penn Treebank (PTB) Tagset
• Open class - words tend to be added (neologism)
  • Noun, verb, adjective, etc
• Closed class - new words tend not to be added
  • Pronoun, determiners, quantifiers, conjunctions, modals & auxiliary, preposition
• PTB distinguishes between singular and plural nouns , but not transitive and intransitive verbs

Lecture 7 - 2018/09/25

• P(outcome i) = #(outcome i)/#(all events)
• π_i = P(Q₁ = 1) = #(Q₁ = 1)/#(sentences)
• a_ij = P(Q_t+1 = j | Q_t = i) = #(i, j)/#(i)
• b_ik = P(O_t = k | Q_t = i) = #(word k, tag i)/#(i)
• Forward algorithm
  • Uses DP to avoid unnecessary recalculations
  • Create table of all possible state sequences, annotated with probabilities
  • Trellis - table for possible state sequences
  • Runtime O(N²T)
• Backward algorithm
  • Trellis with cells β_i(t)
  • Unlike α_i(t), it excludes the current word
• Forward & backward
  • P(O|θ) = Σ^N_i=1 α_i(t)β_i(t) for any t = 1 .. T
• Log sum trick - to avoid underflow (from small numbers), work in log domain
• Viterbi algorithm - similar to forward algorithm, but replace summation with max
  • Used to find most likely state sequence
  • Backpointers - keep track of max entry; work backwards to recover best label sequence
• Unsupervised training
  • No state sequences; have to estimate them
  • Initialize params randomly
  • Viterby EM (‘Hard EM)
    • Prediction and updates using Viterbi algorithm
  • Soft predictions - probabilities of all possible state sequences

Lecture 8 - 2018/09/27

• Chunking - find syntactic chunks in sentence; not hierarchical
• Named-entity recognition (NER) - identify elements in text corresponding to high level categories (eg person, organization, location)
• IOB Tagging - label whether word is inside, outside, or at beginning of span
  • Eg for Org, McGill University would be labelled B I, as both compose a single organization
• Generative models - learn joint distributions P(X, Y)
  • Can be applied to new models, unlike discriminative
• Discriminative models - learn conditional distributions P(Y|X)
• Standard HMM - product of probabilities
  • Forward algorithm - P(X|θ)
  • Viterbi algorithm - argmax_yP(X, y|θ)
• Linear-chain conditional random fields (CRF) - Sums over features & time-steps
  • Replaces HMM products by numbers that are not probabilities, but linear combinations of weights & feature values
  • Allows word templates
  • Forward algorithm - Z(X)
  • Viterbi algorithm - argmax_YP(Y|X, θ)
• To avoid overfitting, make weights close to zero
  • Done be adding an extra term (-θ_k/σ²) for regularization

Lecture 9 - 2018/10/02

• Linear models
  • Includes logistic regressions, support vector machines, etc
  • Cannot learn complex non-linear functions (eg starts with capital and not at beginning of sentence -> proper noun)
• Artificial neural network
  • Automatically learns non-linear functions from input to output
• Feedforward
  • All connections flow forward (no loops)
  • Each layer of hidden units fully connected to next
• Activation function
  • Linear combination of inputs & weights → non-linearity
  • Popular choices
    • Sigmoid function
    • Tanh function
    • Rectifier/ramp function: g(x) = max(0, x)
  • Need non-linearity, otherwise we are just transforming a linear function into another linear function
• Loss function
  • Measures how much error is made during predictions
  • y - correct distribution
  • ŷ - predicted distribution
  • L(y, ŷ) - loss function
• Training
  • Typically by stochastic gradient descent
  • Back propagation - derive new values from error signal back to inputs
• Recurrent neural network
• Long-term dependencies in language
  • Dependencies between words can be arbitrarily far apart
    • Eg look up [x] can be written as look [x] up
  • Cannot easily model with HMMs or LC-CRFs, but possible with RNNs

Lecture 10 - 2018/10/04

• Syntax
  • How words can be arranged to form grammatical sentence
  • Invalid sentences are prefixed with *
• Constituency
  • Group of words that behave as a unit
    • Noun phrases - three people on the bus, Justin Trudeau
    • Adjective phrases - blue, very good
  • Tests for constituency
    • Check if they can appear in similar syntactic environment
      • Eg I saw [it, three people on the bus, *on the]
    • Can be placed in different positions/replaced as a unit
    • Can be used to answer a questions
• Grammatical relations
  • Subject - tend to come before verbs
  • Direct object - the boy kicked the ball
  • Indirect object - she gave him a good beating
  • Some verbs require different number of arguments
    • Eg relax (subj), steal (subj, dobj), give (subj, iobj, dobj)
• Formal grammar - rules that generate a set of strings that make up a language
  • Format of A → B
• Constituent tree
  • Trees & sentences generated by previous rules
  • Entries on the LHS of arrow are non-terminals
  • Entries on the RHS of arrows are terminals
• free grammar (CFG)
  • 4-tuple
    • N - set of non-terminal symbols
    • Σ - set of terminal symbols
    • R - set of rules or productions of form A → (Σ ∪ N)*, and A &in; N
    • S - designated start symbol, S &in; N

Lecture 11 - 2018/10/09

• Parsing algorithms
  • Top-down - start at top of tree, expanding downwards with rewrite rules
    • Eg Earley parser
  • Bottom-up - start from input words and build bigger subtrees until a tree spans the whole sentence
    • Eg CYK algorithm, shift-reduce parser
• CYK Algorithm
  • DP algorithm - partial solutions stored & efficiently reused
  • Steps
    • Convert CFG to appropriate form
    • Set up table of possible constituents
    • Fill in table
    • Read table to recover all possible parsers
• CNF Rules
  • A → B C D becomes A → X1 D and X1 → B C
  • A → s B becomes A → X2 B and X2 → s
  • A → B - replace all B on LHS with A
• Set up table
  • Let sentence have N words, w[0] ... w[N - 1]
  • Create table where cell i, j represents phrase spanning from w[i:j + 1]
    • Only need half table since i < j
• Running through table
  • Base case - one word phrase - check all non-terminals
• PCFG - CFG with probabilities for each rule
  • For each nonterminal A &in; N
    • Σ_{α → β &in; R s.t. α = A} Pr(α → β) = 1
• Extend CYK to PCFG by calculating partial probabilities as you fill the table
  • Only best probability is included per cell
• Train PCFG with treebank, such as WSG
  • Simple version: MLE estimate
    • Pr(α → β) = #(α → β) / #α
      • Not great:
        • No context
          • Example: NPs in subject and object positions are not identically distributed
        • Too sparse
          • WIth the word ‘ate’, ‘ate quickly’, ‘ate with a fork’, ‘ate a sandwich’, etc are all labelled differently. Should be factorized, eg having an adverbial modifier

Lecture 12 - 2018/10/11

• Adding context to PCFG
  • Append parent categories (eg NP^S → PRP to NP^VP → PRP)
• Removing context from long chain rule by splitting them into separate rule
  • Eg Pr(VP → START AdvP VBD NP PP END) to
    • Pr(VP → START AdvP)
    • Pr(VP → AdvP VBD)
    • Pr(VP → VBD NP)
    • Pr(VP → NP PP)
    • Pr(VP → PP END)
• Markovization
  • Vertical markovization - adding ancestors as context
    • Zeroth order - vanilla PCFGs
    • First order - one parent only (see above)
    • nth order - add n parents
  • Horizontal markovization - breaking RHS into parts
    • Infinite order - vanilla PCFGs
    • First order - pairs (see above)
    • Can choose any order with interpolations
• Semantics - study of meaning in language
  • Meaning of words - lexical semantics
• Referent - person/thing to which a expression refers
• Extensional definition - all things for which a definition applies, as opposed to intention or comprehension
• Intensional definition - necessary and sufficient conditions
• Multiple words can refer to the same referent. Used in different contexts → different senses.
  • Example of venus, morning star, evening star, which are all venus
• Hyponym/hypernym - ISA (is a) relationship
  • Monkey & mammal, Montreal & city, wine & beverage, etc. ([hyponym] is a [hypernym])
• Synonym/Antonym - roughly same/different meaning
• Homonymy
  • Homophone - same sound (son vs sun)
  • Homograph - same written form (lead (noun) vs lead (verb))
• Polysemy - multiple related meanings
  • Eg newspaper
    • Daily weekly publication
    • Business that publishes newspaper (meaning above)
    • Physical object that is the product of a newspaper publisher
    • Cheap paper made from wood pulp
• Homonymy is typically with unrelated meaning, whereas polysemy is with related meaning
• Metonymy - substitution of one entity for another related one
  • Eg
    • Ordering a dish (food, not a physical dish)
    • I work for the local paper (place, not object)
    • Quebec City is cutting our budget again (government, not location)
    • The loonie is at a 11-year low (value, not physical loonie)
  • Synecdoche - specific kind involving whole-part relations
    • All hands on deck
• Holonymy/meronymy - whole part relationships
  • Holonym → whole, meronym → part
• Computational approach
  • Heuristic - eg Lesk’s
  • Supervised ML - lots of work
  • Unsupervised - eg Yarowsky’s
• Lesk’s
  • Given a sentence, construct a word bag from definitions of all senses of context words, get the overlaps between each sense and the word in question, then select the one with the highest overlap
• Yarowsky’s
  • Gather data set with target word to be disambiguated
  • Automatically label small seed set of examples
  • Repeat for a while
    • Train from seed set
    • Apply model to entire data set
    • Keep highly confident classification outputs to be new seed set
  • Use last model as final model

Lecture 13 - 2018/10/16

• Hearst patterns - pairs of terms in hyponym-hypernym relationships tend to occur in certain lexico-syntactic patterns
  • Can find relations through key words (cause, induce, stem (from), etc)
  • Can find relations through co-occurring words (such as, and, or)
  • Can find relations through words that tend to co-occur with target words
• Term-context matrix
  • Each row is a vector representation of word through context
    • Context can refer to nearest ‘x’ neighbouring words
• Cosine similarity
  • sim(A, B) = (A · B)/(||A|| ||B||)
  • -1 if vectors point in opposite direction, 0 if orthogonal, 1 if same direction
  • Positive (eg count) vectors are scored within 0 and 1
• Cosine similarity is not enough to determine synonymy
  • High cosine similarity can also indicate antonyms, word senses
• Similarity - synonymy, hypernymy, hyponymy
• Relatedness - anything that might be associated (eg good and bad)
• Cosine similarity is really a measure of relatedness
• Rescaling vectors
  • Pointwise mutual information (PMI)
    • pmi(w₁, w₂) = log (P(w₁, w₂)/(P(w₁)P(w₂)))
    • Numerator - probability of both words occurring
    • Denominator - probability of each word occurring in general
  • If ratio < 1, PMI is negative
    • Often disregarded → positive PMI (PPMI)
• Compressing term-context matrix
  • Often very sparse, lots of zeros
  • Singular value decomposition (SVD)
    • X = W x Σ x C^T
      • m is rank of matrix X
      • Rows of W are new word vectors
      • Rows of C (cols of C^T) are new context vectors
      • Σ is diagonal matrix of singular values of X (sqrt of eigenvalues of X^TX, from highest to lowest)
  • Truncated SVD
    • Throw out some singular values (lowest ones) in Σ
  • Word embeddings
    • Neural network models
  • Skip-gram
• Validation
  • Word similarity
    • a : b :: c : d - what is d?
      • Eg man : king :: woman : ? (man is to king as woman is to queen)
    • Solved by assuming vector differences are 0: v_a - v_b = v_c - v_d
• Can download pretrained word2vec embeddings from web
  • Advantages - trained, large quantity, cheap, easy to try
  • Disadvantages - doesn’t always work

Lecture 14 - 2018/10/18

• Compositionality - meaning of phrase depends on meanings of its parts
  • Idioms often violate compositionality
• Co-compositionality - meanings of words depend also on other words that they are composed with
  • Considering words such as rose, wine, cheeks, red does not combine compositionally, but rather co-compositionally
• Semantic inference - making explicit something that is implicit
  • I want to visit the capital of Italy; capital of Italy is Rome; &therefore; I want to visit Rome
• Montagovian semantics - using logical formalism to represent natural language inferences
• First-order predicate calculus
  • Domain of discourse - set of entities we care about
  • Variables - potential elements of domain
    • Typically lower case
  • Predicates - maps elements of domain to truth values
    • Can be different valences (eg takes multiple elements)
  • Functions - maps elements to other elements
    • Can be different valences
      • Valence 0 function is a constant
  • Logical connectives - ¬, &wedge;, &vee;, →, ↔
  • Quantifiers - ∃, ∀
• Interpretation of first order logic (FOL)
  • Domain of discourse (D)
  • Mapping for functions to elements of D
  • Mapping for predicates to True or False
  • All students who study and do homework will get an A
    • ∀x.(study(x) &wedge; hw(x)) → grade(x) = A
• Lambda calculus - describes computation using mathematical functions
  • Definitions
    • Variables (eg x)
    • λx.t, t is a lambda term
    • ts, t and s are lambda terms
  • Function application (or beta reduction)
    • Given (λx.t)s, replace all instances of x in t with expression s
    • Left associative - abcd = ((ab)c)d
    • (λx.x + y)2 → 2 + y
    • (λx.xx)(λx.x) = (λx.x)(λx.x) = λx.x
  • Allows for partial computations
• Syntax-driven semantic composition
  • Augment CFG with lambda expressions (syntactic composition = function application)
  • Semantic attachments
    • Syntactic composition: A → a₁ … a_n
    • Semantic attachment: {f(a_j.sem, …, a_k.sem)}
  • Proper noun: PN → COMP550 to {COMP550}
  • Type-raised proper noun: PN → COMP550 to {λx.x(COMP550)}
    • We create a function taking in the PN as argument
  • NP rule: NP → PN to {PN.sem}
  • Common noun: N → student to {λx.Student(x)}
    • Type &langle;e, t&rangle;; takes an entity and returns a truth value
  • Intransitive verbs: V → rules to {λx.∃e.Rules(e) &wedge; Ruler(e, x)}
    • Created an event variable e
  • Composition: S → NP VP to {NP.sem(VP.sem)}
• Neo-Davidsonian event semantics
  • Method 1: multi-place predicate: Rules(x)
  • Method 2: Neo-Davidsonian version with event variable: ∃e.Rules(e) &wedge; Ruler(e, x)
    • Reifying event variable makes things more flexible
      • Optional elements such as location and time
      • Can add information to event variable

Lecture 15 - 2018/10/23

• Neo-Davidsonian semantics cont.
  • Transitive verbs: V → enjoys to {λw.λz.w(λx.∃e.Enjoys(e) &wedge; Enjoyer(e, z) &wedge; Enjoyee(e, x))}
• Note that for quantifiers, universal quantifiers use →, while existential ones use &wedge;
• Russell (1905)’s Definite descriptions
  • How to represent ‘the’ in FOL?
    • In “the student took Comp550”, we must enforce
      • An entity who is a student
      • At most one thing referred as a student
      • Student participates in some predicate (“took Comp550”)
    • ∃x.Student(x) &wedge; ∀y.(Student(y) → y = x) &wedge; took(x, COMP550
  • Det → a to {λP.λQ.∃x. P(x) &wedge; Q(x)}
  • Det → the {λP.λQ.∃x P(x) &wedge; ∀y(P(y) → y = x)}
• Scopal ambiguity
  • Eg. Every student took a course
    • every > a: for all students, there exists a course that was taken by that student
    • a > every: there exists a course for which all students took
• Underspecified representation - meaning representation that can embody all possible readings without explicitly enumerating lal of them
• Cooper Storage
  • Associate a store with each FOL so that each reading can be recovered
  • Every student took a course
    • ∃e.took(e) &wedge; taker(e, s₁) &wedge; takee(e, s₂)
      • (λQ.∀x.Student(x) → Q(x), 1)
      • (λQ.∃y.Course(y) &wedge; Q(y), 2)
    • We do not specify the order of each sub expression
  • Compositional rules now modify the inside part of a store, and introduce new idnex variables

Lecture 16 - 2018/10/25

• Coherent - property of discourse that makes sense
  • Contains logical structure/meaning
• Incoherent - eg two completely unrelated sentences
• Cohesion - use of linguistic devices to tie together text units
  • Lexical cohesion - related words in passage
  • Discourse markers - cue words for discourse relations
    • Eg also, and, therefore, however
• Referent - actual entity in the world
• Referring expressions - phrases that refer to the referent
• Referring expressions towards the same referent are said to corefer
• Antecedent - thing that exists before or logically precedes another
• Anaphor - points to an antecedent that precedes it
• Cataphor - points to an antecedent that follows it
• Zero anaphora - ommitting pronouns in certain contexts
  • Languages with this are referred to as pro-drop
  • Eg No habl-o español
  • Others can be dependent on context
• Bridging reference - reference to entities that can be inferred from previously mentioned entity
  • I like my office. The windows are large.
• Non-referential pronouns
  • Pleonastic pronouns
    • It is raining - not sure what ‘it’ is referring to
  • Clefting
    • It is he that is Bob - ‘it’ used to focus on some point
• Pronominal anaphora resolution
  • Relevant info to identify pronouns include gender & number (eg 3Sg), syntactic information, and recency
• C-command - reflexives that must be bound by a subject in certain syntactic relationships
  • Eg ‘the students taught themselves’, themselves refers to the students, if it was ‘them’ it would refer to some other group
• Hobb’s algorithm
  1. Begin at NP node i mmediately dominating the pronoun
  2. Go to first NP or S above it. Call this node X and the path to it p
  3. Do left to right breadth first traversal of all branches below X to left o p. Propose as antecedent any NP node encountered that has an NP or S between it and X
  4. If X is highest S in sentence, consider parse trees of previous sentences in recency order, and traverse each in left to right breadth first order. When NP encountered, propose as antecendent. If X not highest S, continue to step 5
  5. From X, go to first NP or S above it. Call this node X and path to it p
  6. If X is NP and p doens’t pass through Nominal that X immediately dominates, propose X as antecedent
  7. Do left to right breadth first traversal of all branches below X to left of p. Propose any NP encountered as antecedent
  8. If X is S, do left to right breadth first traversal of all branches below X to right of p, but don’t go below any NP or S encountered, Propose any NP encountered as antecedent
  9. Go to step 4

Lecture 17 - 2018/10/30

• This-anaphora
  • May refer to complex chunks of information
• Midterm review
  • CYK